BBC Impartiality: Treason Edition

Why would a so-called 'public service broadcaster' intentionally orchestrate a political discussion in public in which the audience was filled mostly with people hostile to, if not outright hateful towards, one of the panel members, and in which almost-all the questions were either loaded or rhetorical in nature, and slanted against that panel member?

We would respectfully submit that such arrangements are not indicative of impartiality and that simply allowing Mr Griffin to appear on the Question Time programme did not and could not absolve the BBC of its duty to be impartial.  Of course, our view is that the BBC cannot be impartial anyway and that impartiality is a myth, and in the case of the BBC, also a lie.  We think BBC Question Time, like the rest of the BBC's output - political and non-political - is a window into what the Corporation really thinks about the white British.

This is not a 'national broadcaster' and this is not 'public service broadcasting'.  It is pure propaganda.  It is also treason.